Council minutes Nov 2018;  Zafferana Etnea

Comment

Council minutes Nov 2018; Zafferana Etnea

Dear friends,

A year ago IFOR members attending council were already starting their journey back home from Zafferana Etnea, Italy. After having spent more than a week discussing constitutional and structural details while also having thought provoking discussions between sessions.
Some of us got to meet each other for the first time and make many lasting connections and friendships.

This year we are excited to celebrate the 100th year anniversary of the formal establishment of International Fellowship of Reconciliation. Here is to many more years of fellowship and community working towards peace.

We are happy to announce that we are finally done with translating, formatting and editing the minutes. We thank all those who cooperated with translations, Jean-Pierre Masamba, Peter Cousins and Zaira Zafarana for overseeing the entire process.

You can download the minutes according to language here:
English Version
Spanish Version
French Version

Once again we thank all of our supporters, subscribers and good friends that are doing the work of peace around the world.

With warm regards from ICOM and IFOR staff, we wish you a great ending of the year.

In peace and all that is good,
IFOR

Comment

IFOR newsletter 2019, read through to download this years newsletter!

Comment

IFOR newsletter 2019, read through to download this years newsletter!

Dear IFOR community and friends,

It is with great joy that we present to you IFOR's newsletter September 2019. This is an issue comprised of news and updates sent in from different BGA's and UN representatives. This is a joint effort to better communicate and show the good work that is being done by different Branches, Affiliates, Groups and UN representatives around the world.

We are thankful to all the cooperated and sent in their news and updates.

We enclose the newsletter as PDF's in English, You can download it by clicking here.

You can also join the newsletter subscription by filing in your information here.

In Peace and all that is good,

The secretariat, IFOR


Estimada comunidad y amigos de IFOR,

Con gran alegría les presentamos el boletín de IFOR de septiembre de 2019. Este es un tema compuesto por noticias y actualizaciones enviados por diferentes representantes de BGAs y de la ONU. Este es un esfuerzo conjunto para tratar de comunicarnos mejor y demostrar el buen trabajo que están haciendo las diferentes ramas, afiliados, grupos y representantes de la ONU al rededor de todo el mundo.

Agradecemos a todos los que cooperaron y enviaron sus noticias y actualizaciones.

Adjuntamos el boletín como PDF, puede descargarlo haciendo clic aquí.

También puede unirse a la suscripción al boletín informativo aquí.

En paz y todo lo bueno,

La secretaria, IFOR



Chère communauté et amis d'IFOR,

C'est avec une grande joie que nous vous présentons la lettre d'information d'IFOR de septembre 2019. Il s'agit d'un numéro composé d'actualités et de mises à jour envoyées par différents représentants de BGA et de l'ONU. Il s’agit d’un effort commun visant à améliorer la communication et à montrer le bon travail accompli par différentes branches, filiales, groupes et représentants des Nations Unies à travers le monde.

Nous sommes reconnaissants à tous ceux qui ont coopéré et qui ont envoyé leurs nouvelles et mises à jour.

Nous joignons la lettre d’information au format PDF en français. Vous pouvez la télécharger en cliquant ici.

Vous pouvez également vous inscrire à la newsletter en remplissant vos informations ici.

En paix et tout ce qui est bon,

Le secretariat, IFOR

Comment

Comment

IFOR engages at UN for the 34th UPR session on Angola and Italy

On October 8th-11th IFOR UN reps attended to the pre-session of the 34th UPR organized by UPR Info at the Palais des Nations in Geneva and engaged in several advocacy initiatives.

At the upcoming session of the UPR among the states under review there are Angola and Italy and IFOR submitted a report for both countries which you can see below. As to Angola military service and conscientious objection, freedom of religion and restrictions on civil society, for instance, have been addressed; as to Italy the report presented the issues of public health risks connected to military installations with reference to the case of Niscemi and the Mobile User Objective System in Sicily, the selling of weapons to countries at war and the pushing back of migrants and cooperation with Libya. 

The UPR is a State-driven process, which provides the opportunity for each State to present what actions they have taken to improve the human rights situation in their countries and to fulfil their human rights obligations; at the same time member states have the possibility to address recommendations to the State under review.

NGOs have the possibility to contribute with information that can be added to the “other stakeholders” report which is considered during the review.

Prior to the UPR session there is a pre-session, which is designed to facilitate the direct engagement of civil society and to provide member states with opportunities to find out more information on human rights in different countries. During the pre-session some NGOs are selected to give brief presentations and then all civil society representatives have the possibility to advocate directly with permanent delegations in bilateral meetings. 

The 34th session starts in Geneva on Monday November 4th with the review of Italy; this is a symbolic date for this country which remember the end of the First World War and celebrate military forces. The first week of November is also a year since IFOR Council in Sicily and the International Conference on migration “On the move”; a year later IFOR continues to engage and follow up on those issues.

Angola review takes place at the end of that very week, on November 7th and we look forward for recommendations on the issue of conscientious objection, which is one of the main field IFOR is working on at the UN in Geneva.


These UN meetings are broadcasted live here.

For more information on the UPR session click here.  

For details on UPR pre-session of Angola click here and for Italy click here

IFOR submission about Italy

IFOR submission about Angola

Comment

IFOR STANDS AT UN FOR THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF "PEOPLE ON THE MOVE" AND FOR THE DECRIMINALIZATION OF SOLIDARITY

Comment

IFOR STANDS AT UN FOR THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF "PEOPLE ON THE MOVE" AND FOR THE DECRIMINALIZATION OF SOLIDARITY

During the last session of the UN Human Rights Coucil, held in Geneva last September, IFOR has delivered the following Oral Statement during the General Debate on the report presented by the High Commissioner Ms. Bachelet:

"The International Fellowship of Reconciliation appreciates the call upon States “to address the human rights impact of climate change, including in relation to business activities” and the reminder of “the need for policy coherence – nationally and internationally” .

As highlighted, the consequences of climate change are the reason for many people to leave their homes.
Madam High Commissioner, Excellencies,
The human rights of people on the move are constantly threatened and violated. How can we tolerate caged kids, families divided at borders and shipwrecked survivors refused a place at safety or forced back or deported into areas of conflict, deprivation, discrimination and violation.
We support the call to European States to adopt a more effective coordinated action in the Mediterranean and to end the criminalisation of civil organisations that are carrying out life-saving work in the area and are fined for doing it.
This summer we have witnessed too many rescue boats seeking too long for a safe place to disembark. Sea-Watch 3, Proactiva Open Arms, Mare Jonio [of Mediterranea Saving Humans], Eleonore [of LIFELINE], to mention just some examples [others are Ocean Viking of SOS MEDITERRANEE, Alan Curdi of sea-eye...]
It took the courage of such individuals as Carola Rackete to choose humanity over political propaganda to guarantee safety and human rights for migrants; an act of civil disobedience against a ministerial order contrary to International and Human Rights Law. It took the orders of judges to respect international law and to decriminalize the rescuing of people and to re-establish that under the Law rescue is an obligation and the prohibition on entering domestic waters cannot cancel a humanitarian obligation under the International Conventions."

Watch the live-stream here: http://webtv.un.org/…/item2-general-debate-c…/6085299999001…
(IFOR's statement at 01:50:13)

Read the whole statement by clicking here:

Comment

IFOR addresses UN Human Rights Council outlining the urgent need to take action to implement the Right to Life

Comment

IFOR addresses UN Human Rights Council outlining the urgent need to take action to implement the Right to Life

On September 16th, International Fellowship of Reconciliation - IFOR addressed the UN Human Rights Council, outlining the urgent need to take action to implement the Right to Life which is “the supreme right from which no derogation is permitted”.
If the right to life is violated, no other rights can be exercised!
Right to Life should include as well the right to refuse to kill!
IFOR called upon States to ratify the UN Treaty on the abolition of nuclear weapons and referred to the 2nd World March for Peace and Nonviolence which will start in Madrid on October 2nd 2019.

You can read the whole statement here.


You can watch it here at 01:05:34 at http://webtv.un.org/…/item3-general-debate-…/6086710348001/…

Comment

Open Letter to Members of the European Parliament: "The EU peace project is under threat"  #disarmament #CallToMEP

Comment

Open Letter to Members of the European Parliament: "The EU peace project is under threat" #disarmament #CallToMEP

Open Letter to Members of the European Parliament signed by 61 organizations included some IFOR branches such as Agir pour la Paix, Kerk en Vrede, MIR Italia and Internationaler Versöhnungsbund.

Brussels, 2 September 2019

Dear Madam, dear Sir,

Member of the European Parliament,

As a coalition of 61 organisations we are writing to express our deep concern about a number of policy proposals which, taken together, call into question the EU’s founding values of human rights, peace and disarmament. As a newly-elected MEP, you will have to give your opinion on EU external action priorities and make final decisions on a number of key files, in particular the next EU budgetary cycle for 2021-2027. Looking at the current proposals and the global context in which they occur paints a worrying picture of the EU’s future path, which increasingly tends towards a controversial military approach to global issues. Since 2017, EU funds have been diverted for military-related spending, with a €590 million envelope to fund military-industrial Research and Development. Before the EU elections, dozens of civil society organisations urged candidates to ‘save the European peace project’ and ‘work towards a peaceful Europe’.

➔ Today we urge you as elected MEP to go beyond the general motto “a Europe that protects”, and start analysing whether the proposed prioritities and funding are truly the most effifficient ways of making Europe and the world a safer place to live in. [...] Creating a fully-fledged European Defense Fund (EDF) or a so-called ‘European Peace Facility’ (EPF) goes beyond providing additional funds to European initiatives: it opens new areas of cooperation whose legitimacy and contribution to the EU Treaty objectives (‘to promote peace, its values and the well-being of its peoples’) are highly questionable. The €10.5 billion off-budget EPF will train and equip the security and military apparatus of partner countries, potentially including with lethal weaponry. Peace organisations are quite critical of this proposal as its intended contribution to peace is far from guaranteed. [...]

As for the “security for development” arguments used to justify the CBSD program and the Peace Facility, there is little evidence that military-focused ‘train and equip’ efforts can lead to improved peace, justice, and development outcomes - quite the contrary. Even with mitigation measures in place, there is a high risk that EU funded weapons and support would be used in fragile countries to commit atrocities and fuel violent conflicts. Research shows that over the past 35 years, 77% of violent conflicts ended through a peace agreement while only 16.4% ended through a military victory. EU funding and attention should therefore focus on creating the conditions for the peaceful resolution of conflicts, including identifying and addressing its root causes. Climate change, for example, is today widely recognized as a major and sustained risk to global security, contributing to increased natural disasters, conflicts over basic resources, migration and forced displacements, as well as exacerbating other drivers such as poverty, economic shocks and weak institutions. Yet, the peaceful resolution of conflicts and the fight against their root causes are not sufficiently prioritized. This was recently illustrated in the EU strategic agenda for 2019-2024, which defined migration and the protection of borders as the first priority, with the climate crisis clearly playing second fiddle to an overblown defense agenda. The next MFF should focus on peace-building and on the major factors of conflicts and forced migration, such as poverty, human rights violations or climate change. For this to happen we urge you to: Stop the Defense Fund by rejecting the provisional agreement in the second reading phase and the €13-billion envelope in the next MFF. Stop the militarization of EU borders and ensure that EU funding will prioritize safe, humane and dignified pathways to - and hosting conditions in - Europe, in line with international law and the right to asylum. Accelerate the pace and scale of action to significantly decrease EU greenhouse gas emissions, in order to reduce them by 65% by 2030 in line with the IPCC special report , and to zero by 2040. Maintain separate external financing instruments for development aid, human rights & democracy,

humanitarian assistance and peace-building in the next MFF with significantly increased budgets; introduce a cap for CBSD activities in the NDICI. Call on the EU Council to take a step back as regards the so-called Peace Facility, particularly its ‘train and equip’ component, and to engage with civil society to discuss in depth its political parameters and added-value. Call for EU external policies to prioritize the peaceful resolution's and prevention of conflicts and the fighting of their root causes, including by driving a 100% renewable, climate resilient, zero carbon economy at the global level, and by helping poor countries to become energy independent and adapt to climate change. You will find in the annex more background information as well as links to more detailed documents produced by civil society actors on the concerns raised in this letter. We hope you will find them instructive and we remain at your disposal should you have questions.

Yours sincerely"

Read the complete Letter here: http://enaat.org/…/Letter-to-new-EP_EU-Peace-Project-under-…
Sign the petition yourself: https://act.wemove.eu/campaigns/EU-dont-invest-in-weapons

Comment

Looking back at the CONFERENCE ON MIGRATION: #OnTheMove

Comment

Looking back at the CONFERENCE ON MIGRATION: #OnTheMove

A new conversation about migrants, led by migrants themselves

In November 2018 the International Fellowship of Reconciliation (IFOR), together with its Italian branch (MIR Italia), invited members, activists and interested fellow humans from over 40 different countries to join a «New Conversation about Migration» in Catania, Sicily. The conference, held on the weekend before the international Council of IFOR, had the primary objective of creating an open platform to talk with migrants, rather than simply talk about migration itself. 

Therefore, the panels organized were focused primarily on the issues concerning migration causes, the individual experience of the journey and strategies of hospitality and interaction. Zaira Zafarana, IFOR UN Representative and member of MIR Italia, energetically coordinated and moderated the conference. The Conference conversations and contributions were simultaneously interpreted into English, Italian, French or Spanish to include as many participants as possible. By establishing a new way to converse and think about migration, the participants of the conference sought to develop a broader and more diverse perspective on the topic; to overcome the Eurocentric perspective often dominating the discourse on migration and integration politics in Europe.

Since the starting of the conference “migration” has been identified as a wider subject including different elements to be addressed. Many participants were puzzled yet intrigued by the diversity of migration patterns. For instance, most migrants worldwide are involved in internal migration within their region, moving to other cities or to neighboring countries. An idea that differs from the everyday understanding of South-North-immigration enforced by media. Throughout the conference 14 representatives openly shared their very personal and emotional experiences regarding their endeavors, as well as the life they left behind in their home country, often describing hopeless and painful pictures of degrading living-conditions. 

Listening to these painful testimonies, hearing about the injustice and the inhumanity described, participants showed empathy, felt the disappointment about conditions lived and many were supremely moved. Nevertheless, the united efforts and strong will of people from all over the world, ambitiously advocating for peace, non-violence and solidarity, created a hopeful, energetic and confident atmosphere.

One noteworthy issue, among the already many compelling stories, was the alerting gap between the theoretical idea of human rights and their practical implementation. The experiences shared by the participating refugees and migrants demonstrated circumstances where their rights are not substantially protected and respected; instead the trend moves towards criminalizing migrants while people and organizations remain helping them. 

Father Zerai, from the Habeshia Agency declared once again that: "The rights of the weak are not weak rights. The rights of the poor should not be poor rights.” Abdelfetah Mohammed an intercultural mediator migrated from Eritrea to Sicily gave a brief insight into his own story: 

„I was moving from place to place for 11 years, which was not planned at all. I did not come straight to Italy. I moved when the violence became too dangerous … war is always waged against the people, therefore, living in conflict areas becomes unbearable. Most of the people flee within the region, since they hope to go back home as soon as the violence is over. No one wants to be a refugee.“

Another speaker was Junior Nzita Nsuami. He is a former child soldier from the Democratic Republic of Congo, founder of the organization "Paix pour les Enfants", and a goodwill ambassador for the UN campaign #enfantpassoldat. He has published an autobiography about his childhood experiences and because of death threats in DRC, Junior got asylum in Canada. Junior stated that children pay with their lives and lose their childhood while the European and US-American arms industry is profiting from wars fought in Africa and from child soldiers’ practice. He insisted that there is no positive war and that the only way to fight is in a non-violent and peaceful manner. Then, he concluded his speech with a forceful and urgent appeal towards the audience: 

“The children pay the price of the weapons that Europe produces. I am African, but I would like to speak as a citizen of the world today. […] I urge you in Europe and in the USA: Stop with the gun production! You should know that in Africa we don´t have factories to produce weapons, they are all in Europe and the United States. Your factories will enrich themselves and your gross domestic product will rise. There are more than 300.000 child soldiers in the world – It’s enough! Nonviolence and education are the only ways for our world.”

During the Conference it became clear that the central problems connected to migration are war, global injustice and human rights violations, all brightly debated by the audience throughout the conference. The current situation in Europe was often criticized and the European Union’s credibility called into question, one crucial example being that although the EU declares respect for Human Rights and their promulgation as one of its core values, the political practice often is in contrast. The island of Sicily, where the conference took place, is a vivid example of these practices: FRONTEX, the agency for the "protection" of the European external borders, is based in Sicily. The restrictive European policy endangers migrants, asylum-seekers and refugees who are thus risking their lives in reaching out for help. It’s time to begin rethinking the entire concept of borders and belongingness in the Mediterranean; a more distinctive vision was proposed by Runbir Serkepkani from the “Christian Peacemaker Teams” in Greece: 

“[The Mediterranean Sea] is militarized. We need to remember that the Mediterranean is a sea that is connecting hundreds of cultures, and languages, and people, all having a connected history. What’s happening is injustice and what’s happening needs to change. Mediterranean is not “Mare Nostrum” it’s “Mare Liberum” - it’s the “Sea of Liberty” and we need to remember that.”

One of the biggest lessons drawn from the Conference on Migration was to dissolve the Eurocentric perspective on migration, as well as the racist and post-colonial structures influencing the modes the issue has been discussed. Therefore, we should be listening to refugees and come together and talk with migrants as with people within sources like #OnTheMove in order to find appropriate and adequate solutions. 

A thriving example of solidarity and integration was presented by Roberta Ferruti from ReCoSol - Rete dei Comuni Solidali (Network of Solidary Communities). She spoke about Riace where the Italian community took in and integrated refugees that stranded at their shore in 2003. Today the model is replicated in over 40 Italian communities and inspired projects in seven other European countries. Although Riace lost financial assistance by the government and faces financial and political difficulties the community fights for the project’s persistence. In this light, Ferruti insists that solidarity can never be a crime and advocates for civil resistance and if necessary civil disobedience to preserve human rights and human dignity.

During the two days Conference, there was a dinner shared at Misericordia Mosque, which gave way for encounters and interactions between participants to the conference and the local Muslim community of Catania. The Conference concluded with an inspiring and exciting concert, where participants, together with other locals, enjoyed the rhythmic beats of the migrant’s bands Jhonny’s Family Project and Ciauda and were dancing until late in the night.

For the Spanish version click here

For the French version click here

Comment

IFOR's Bangladesh branch Anando responds to Rohingya Refugees in Cox’s Bazar

Comment

IFOR's Bangladesh branch Anando responds to Rohingya Refugees in Cox’s Bazar

IFORs Branch Anando has been conducting valuable activities in service of the Rohingya Refugees since September 2017 and will continue to do so till September 2019. Anando has been distributing food items to the Rohingya Refugees, now Anando is distributing non-food items to the Rohingya refugees. Click through to read about the great work that Anando is doing in Cox’s Bazar.

Comment