IFOR calls on the UN to stop the war in Ukraine and restates that the right to conscientious objection cannot be restricted nor suspended.

Comment

IFOR calls on the UN to stop the war in Ukraine and restates that the right to conscientious objection cannot be restricted nor suspended.

Members of the Commission of Inquiry. President E. Mose, Ms. P. De Greiff and Madam j. Dzumhur.

On the occasion of the 51st session of the UN Human Rights Council, as previously decided by the Members States (A/HRC/RES/49/1 and A/HRC/RES/S-34/1) the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the situation of human rights in Ukraine stemming from the Russian aggression presented its oral update in the plenary.

After the presentation and the following statements by Member States and National Human Rights Institutions, NGOs had the opportunity to take the floor.

IFOR, thus, delivered an oral statement calling on the UN Member States to act to stop the war and save lives and addressed the issue of the violation of the right to conscientious objection to military service, restating its support to all those who refuse to kill.

IFOR recalled as well international standards on the non-derogability of the right to conscientious objection and expressed its concern for the current suspension of this right in Ukraine and its violation in the occupied territories.


Human Rights Council, 51st Session 

23rd September 2022 

Item 4: Interactive dialogue with the International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine Oral statement delivered by the International Fellowship of Reconciliation. 

Mr. President,  

War should be abolished because it is never a conflict resolution, neither in Ukraine nor in other countries. On the contrary, it brings devastating and dramatic consequences on the people and on the land. 

Excellencies, colleagues, we are here today addressing violations directly connected to the ongoing war. 

The victims are waiting for action. [As we head yesterday during the ID with the SR on Myanmar, concerning another violent conflict, actions speak louder than words.] 

In resolution (A/HRC/S-34/L.1) the Human Rights Council reiterated its demand for an immediate end of military hostilities against Ukraine, and for all parties to the conflict to respect the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law 

We stand in solidarity with the people of Ukraine and mourn with them. We also stand in solidarity with those opposing to war and refusing to kill. 

We have been notified that the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense replied to the Ukrainian Pacifist Movement that "Due to martial law, since 24.02.2022 the temporary military service in Ukraine is no longer implemented. Therefore, the implementation of alternative service is not applicable."

The UN Human Rights Committee has clearly stated that the right to conscientious objection cannot be restricted for reasons of national security.

IFOR is also concerned by the forced mobilization of conscripts in Ukrainian territory controlled by Russian  affiliated armed groups. 

Freedom of thought, conscience and religion is a non-derogable right and, as is freedom of expression, it continues to apply in situations of armed conflict. The right to conscientious objection to military service should be absolutely protected and cannot be restricted, as highlighted by the quadrennial analytical thematic report by OHCHR presented at the 50th session. 

Thank you. 


Click here to watch IFOR main representative to deliver the statement at the UN Human Rights Council.

Click here to read the full statement.

Share this post on social media!


Insights concerning the UN Human Rights Council on the ongoing war in Ukraine


- Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 4 March 2022.

During the 49th session of the UN Human Rights Council, the Council "Decides to urgently establish an independent international commission of inquiry, comprising three human rights experts, to be appointed by the President of the Human Rights Council for an initial duration of one year, complementing, consolidating and building upon the work of the human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine, in close coordination with the human rights monitoring mission in Ukraine and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, with the following mandate: (a) To investigate all alleged violations and abuses of human rights and violations of international humanitarian law, and related crimes in the context of the aggression against Ukraine by the Russian Federation, and to establish the facts, circumstances and root causes of any such violations and abuses; (b) To collect, consolidate and analyse evidence of such violations and abuses, including their gender dimension, and to systematically record and preserve all information, documentation and evidence, including interviews, witness testimony and forensic material, consistent with international law standards, in view of any future legal proceedings; (c) To document and verify relevant information and evidence, including through field engagement, and to cooperate with judicial and other entities, as appropriate; A/HRC/RES/49/1 4 (d) To identify, where possible, those individuals and entities responsible for violations or abuses of human rights or violations of international humanitarian law, or other related crimes, in Ukraine, with a view to ensuring that those responsible are held accountable; (e) To make recommendations, in particular on accountability measures, all with a view to ending impunity and ensuring accountability, including, as appropriate, individual criminal responsibility, and access to justice for victims; (f) To provide the Human Rights Council, at its fifty-first session, with an oral update, to be followed by an interactive dialogue, and a comprehensive written report at its fifty-second session, to be followed by an interactive dialogue, and to submit a report to the General Assembly at its seventy-seventh session"

Learn more about Resolution A/HRC/RES/49/1 here.


- Resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 12 May 2022

During the Special UN Human Rights Council session held in May 2022 the Council adopted a resolution which says that the UN HRC " Reiterates its demand for the immediate cessation of military hostilities against Ukraine and for all parties to the conflict to respect the fundamental principles and rules of international humanitarian law, including to refrain from any attacks against civilians and civilian objects, and to refrain from any human rights violations and abuses in Ukraine; 2. Stresses the need to refrain from any State-sponsored disinformation, propaganda for war or advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, relating to the aggression against Ukraine; 3. Urges the Russian Federation to provide representatives and staff of international human rights and humanitarian institutions, including United Nations specialized agencies, with unhindered, timely, immediate, unrestricted and safe access to A/HRC/RES/S-34/1 3 persons who have been transferred from conflict-affected areas of Ukraine and are held on the territory of the Russian Federation or areas controlled or occupied by the Russian Federation, and to share with relevant parties a comprehensive list of such transferred persons and their whereabouts; 4. Requests the independent international commission of inquiry on Ukraine to conduct an inquiry, consistent with its mandate and international standards, and in coordination with other national and international mechanisms, to address the events in the areas of the Kyiv, Chernihiv, Kharkiv and Sumy regions in late February and in March 2022, including their gender dimension, with a view to holding those responsible to account, and also requests the commission to brief the Human Rights Council on the progress of that inquiry as part of the oral update to the Council at its fifty-first session, and to include its findings after the completion of the inquiry in its report to the Council at its fifty-second session; 5. Requests the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to present an oral update on the grave human rights and humanitarian situation in Mariupol, including an assessment of the nature and causes of violations or abuses of human rights and of violations of international humanitarian law committed there, to the Human Rights Council at its fiftieth session under item 2, to be followed by an interactive dialogue; 6. Encourages relevant thematic special procedure mandate holders, within their respective mandates, to continue to pay particular attention to the situation of human rights in Ukraine stemming from the Russian aggression, and urges all relevant parties to cooperate with those mandate holders; 7. Decides to remain seized of the matter."

Learn more about Resolution A/HRC/RES/S-34/1 here.

Comment

IFOR addresses the right to conscientious objection to military service at the 51st UN Human Rights Council

Comment

IFOR addresses the right to conscientious objection to military service at the 51st UN Human Rights Council

On September 21st, International Peace Day, IFOR took the floor in the plenary of the 51st session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva delivering a statement on the right to conscientious objection to military service.

IFOR acknowledged the quadrennial thematic report presented by the Office of the High Commissioner during the last session of the Council and highlighted concerning issues and including the issue of provisions at wartime not in line with international standards.

IFOR called on the Council to strongly commit and ensure the full implementation of the right to conscientious objection to military service.

As per past practice of the Council, following the presentation of the OHCHR thematic report -which took place during the 50th session-, a resolution on the right to conscientious objection to military service is expected to be adopted during this session of the Council. Ongoing informal negotiations are led by Costa Rica, Croatia and Poland.


Human Rights Council, 51st Session

21 st September 2022

GD Item 3: Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights Oral statement delivered by the International Fellowship of Reconciliation.

Madam Vice President,

IFOR welcomes the report of the OHCHR on the right to conscientious objection to military service which has been presented to this Council during the last session. This is of benefit to the entire international community and all concerned individuals around the world.

The report highlighted some positive progress as the introduction of legal provisions for alternative service in the Republic of Korea [and consequent reduction of imprisoned local objectors] . It also reported the pivotal UN Human Rights Committee Views concerning the Petromelidis v. Greece case which made outstanding jurisprudence on this right.

There are still concerning issues such as the punitive alternative service which continues to affect many conscientious objectors in several countries.

Unfortunately, there are still some States which do not recognize this human right. Too many objectors continue to be imprisoned or forced to flee their country looking for protection.

As highlighted by the previous SR in His report presented in the 50th session, we are deeply alarmed by the violation of this right in situations of armed conflicts and kindly invite the new Special Rapporteur to continue to monitor such violation. In some countries there are special provisions concerning this right at time of armed conflict [which differs from the regular provisions and] do not comply with international standards; other countries deny this right in case of mobilization.

Freedom of thought, conscience and religion is a non-derogable right and it continues to apply regardless of a situation of armed conflict.

The work of this Council is essential to ensure the full enjoyment of the human right of conscientious objection to military service which is inherent to the right to freedom of thought conscience ad religion.

IFOR calls upon the Member States to strongly commit to the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion and collaborate to ensure the full implementation of the right to conscientious objection to military service in all countries, [in compliance with the international standards].

Thank you


Comment

"OBJECT WAR CAMPAIGN" LAUNCH : Petition to support Conscientious Objectors and Deserters from Russia, Belarus and Ukraine

Comment

"OBJECT WAR CAMPAIGN" LAUNCH : Petition to support Conscientious Objectors and Deserters from Russia, Belarus and Ukraine

Traducción Española

Traduction française

PRESS RELEASE

21 September 2022

"OBJECT WAR CAMPAIGN" LAUNCH : Petition to support Conscientious Objectors and Deserters from Russia, Belarus and Ukraine

On the occasion of the International Day of Peace, 21st September, Connection e.V., the International Fellowship of Reconciliation, the European Office for Conscientious Objection and War Resisters' International are calling for a signature campaign for deserters and conscientious objectors from Russia, Belarus and Ukraine. The #ObjectWarCampaign calls on all citizens from everywhere to join the global effort to ensure protection and asylum to conscientious objectors and deserters from Russia, Belarus and Ukraine involved in the current war in the region. They are our hope to refuse war and let peace prevail!

On April 6, 2022, the President of the European Council, Charles Michel, had called on Russian soldiers to desert and promised them protection under refugee law. So far, this promise has not been fulfilled. 

Within the scope of #ObjectWarCampaign, a petition has been prepared for everyone to sign in. The petition is addressed to the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Council Charles Michel and the President of the European Parliament Roberta Metsola. The petition emphasizes the need to uphold the right to asylum to conscientious objectors and deserters from Russia, Belarus and Ukraine by hosting states. The petition launched on the WeMove.eu website can now be signed in German, English, French, Italian and Greek.

There are an estimated 100,000 Russian military draftees and deserters refusing the war of aggression. An estimated 22,000 Belarusian military draftees have left their country because they don’t want to participate in the war in Ukraine. Everyone who has refused service risks several years of prosecution because of their stand against the war. They are hoping for protection in various countries.

Ukraine suspended the right to conscientious objection and closed the border for men between 18 and 60. Over 100,000 men have evaded war involvement in Ukraine and fled abroad. Currently, Ukrainian citizens have temporary residence in the European Union. The #ObjectWarCampaign petition demands that the right to conscientious objection to military service is fully guaranteed in Ukraine.

The petition signatures  are a crucial sign of support for conscientious objectors and deserters. This campaign highlights the importance of opening borders to those who oppose the war at great personal risk in their countries, and calls on everyone around the world to support those who refuse to fight and kill.

Every recruit can be a conscientious objector, every soldier a deserter. Let's support those who refuse to kill and end war together! 

#ObjectWarCampaign
#StandWithObjectors

The launch of the petition has been anticipated by an appeal sent in June 2022, to the European Parliament and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe -supported by 60 organizations from 20 countries - detailing why protection and support for deserters and conscientious objectors on all sides of the Ukrainian war is necessary and moreover that it is a human right. There have already been discussions about this in the European Parliament. 

More information: 
The appeal to the European institutions can be found here.
Background information can be found here.

Contact and interview requests:
Zaira Zafarana, International Fellowship of Reconciliation (IFOR), zaira.zafarana@ifor.org, www.ifor.org (English, Italian)
Rudi Friedrich, Connection e.V., +496982375534, office@Connection-eV.org, www.Connection-eV.org (German, English)
Semih Sapmaz, War Resisters’ International (WRI), semih@wri-irg.org, www.wri-irg.org (English,Turkish)
Sam Biesemans, European Bureau for Conscientious Objection (EBCO), +32477268893, ebco.brussels@skynet.be, www.ebco-beoc.org (French, Dutch, Italian, English)

📌 Share more on social media at https://www.facebook.com/InternationalFellowshipofReconciliation/photos/a.1751009778444220/3294203917458124/

📌 SIGN IT! https://you.wemove.eu/campaigns/russia-belarus-ukraine-protection-and-asylum-for-deserters-and-conscientious-objectors-to-military-service

Comment

IFOR joins international press release on the case of pacifist journalist Ruslan Kotsaba

Comment

IFOR joins international press release on the case of pacifist journalist Ruslan Kotsaba

JOINT PRESS RELEASE by EBCO, IFOR, WRI and Connection e.V.

Drop all charges against Ruslan Kotsaba

18 July 2022

In Ukraine, a trial against Ukrainian journalist, pacifist and conscientious objector Ruslan Kostaba will be held on Tuesday 19 July 2022, simply because he publicly expressed his pacifist views.

The International Fellowship of Reconciliation (IFOR), War Resisters’ International (WRI), the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection (EBCO) and Connection e.V. (Germany) consider his case a clear politically motivated persecution, in violation of his rights to freedom of expression and freedom of thought, conscience and religion, guaranteed under Articles 18 and 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The organisations express their solidarity with Ruslan Kotsaba and urge the Ukrainian authorities to safeguard that all pacifists in Ukraine, including the activists of the Ukrainian Pacifist Movement, are able to freely express their opinions and continue their nonviolent activities.

The organisations also recall their strong condemnation of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and call on the soldiers not to participate in hostilities and on all recruits to refuse military service.

The Ukrainian government should safeguard the right to conscientious objection to military service, fully complying with the European and international standards, amongst others the standards set by the European Court of Human Rights.

Ukraine is a member of the Council of Europe and needs to continue to respect the European Convention of Human Rights. As Ukraine becomes a candidate to join the European Union, it will need to respect the Human Rights as defined in the EU Treaty, and the jurisprudence of the EU Court of Justice, which include the right of conscientious objection.


You can click here to download the statement as a PDF file.

Click here to watch Ruslan Kotsaba's statement recorded before the Court's hearing.

Contact persons:

Visit and share on Facebook!


UPDATE

Next hearing for Ruslan Kotsaba's case is scheduled for September 4th 2022.

Here you can find a video message he recorded before His last hearing.
You can find more information here.

CALL TO ACTION!

International solidarity is very important.

There are several things which can be done, for instance:
- organize a public presence in front of the Ukrainian embassy with signs and then share pictures and/or release about it
- engage with politicians in your country to support Ruslan Kotsaba
- engage with media in your country to cover Ruslan's case
- send the published appeal or your own note to Honourable Andriy Kostin, Prosecutor General of Ukraine,
Riznytska St, 13/15
Kyiv 01011
Ukraine
- share on social media and use hashtag #ConscientiousObjection #FreedomExpression; tag on Fb @peaceukraine (Ukrainian Pacifist Movement)

Comment

IFOR welcomes you to its "INTRODUCTION TO THE UN" program September 19th -23rd 2022

Comment

IFOR welcomes you to its "INTRODUCTION TO THE UN" program September 19th -23rd 2022

The International Fellowship of Reconciliation (IFOR) is glad to invite you to participate in the 3rd edition of the special program aimed to provide an opportunity to come and see the work of IFOR at the United Nations in Geneva and experience first-hand engagement within the UN system.

This year's program is titled “Strengthening civil society engagement within UN system” and is funded by the Otto per Mille of the Waldensian Church of Italy.

The aim is to provide a learning opportunity to civil society representatives, with particular focus to human rights defenders from the Global South, and from minority and vulnerable groups, to take action as human rights advocates within the UN system.

The program will last one week, from Monday September 19th to Friday 23rd 2022.

It will run during the 51st session of the UN Human Rights Council.

Participants will also learn about IFOR work on the right to conscientious objection to military service and about the draft resolution negotiation expected to take place at the UN Human Rights Council on this topic.

Participants will have the opportunity to address other Human Rights topics and thus explore how civil society can fully engage at the UN and network.

We contemplate a group of about ten people, which can move about together and is also small enough to share reflections communally between formal meetings.

Have a look at the first edition here and at the second edition here.

Due to the current situation concerning covid-19, the running of the program could be subject to changes accordingly to the ongoing pandemic.

APPLICANTS

We look for participants who are linked to a civil society organization and are willing to engage in human rights.

Priority will be given to those from the Global South, and from minority and vulnerable groups.

Participants should be:

-        at least 18 years old

-        fluent in spoken English

-        available for the entire week period

-        directly involved in the current work of a civil society organization

-        inclined to teamwork

-        motivated with regards to the human rights and international affairs agenda

-        ready to follow up within their own organization

PROGRAMME OF THE WEEK

The detailed program will be sent to the participants prior to the start of the program.

Program will start in Geneva on Monday 19th at 3 pm.

During the week the participants will attend working sessions of the Human Rights Council -which include plenary meetings, negotiations of resolutions, side events-, assist in the drafting and delivering of oral statements, participate in informal meetings with partner NGOs, explore advocacy initiatives.

The program will conclude on Friday 23rd at noon.

Every day participants will have the possibility to meet together to exchange on the experience and deepen topics and procedures of interest with IFOR UN representatives; in addition, there will be a tutoring opportunity to better follow the Human Rights Council working sessions, the general debates and interactive dialogues planned in the Program of Work of the UN.

ACCOMMODATION AND TRAVEL

IFOR has pre-arranged a single room accommodation with full board near the Palais des Nations, in Geneva. These costs (accommodation + meals) will be covered by IFOR through the Otto per Mille fund of the Waldensian Church. All participants will receive a free pass for local public transportation for the entire period.

Other costs (round trip travel to Geneva and personal leisure) shall be met by the participants and/or their organizations.

Participants will need to take care of possible Visa requirements as well.

HOW TO APPLY

To apply, interested people need to fill in the online form here.  

Deadline for application is August 30th 2022, at 1pm CEST. The confirmation of the application will be notified to the candidates within the following 48 hours.

If necessary, we will give preference to:

a) those who are prepared to commit for the entire week

b) persons with a direct connection with IFOR

c) members of vulnerable or minority groups

For further information you are welcome to contact the coordinator of the program at zaira.zafarana@ifor.org

NOTE: Given the current situation of the pandemic the program will run accordingly to the actual situation and safety measures in place. Applicants are invited to check all requirements given by the Swiss Federal Office for people traveling from other countries.

Looking forward to having you in Geneva!


You can download the call here.

You are welcome to share on social media here.

READ ABOUT OUR PARTICIPANTS' FEEDBACK:

"It was an intensive and interesting time with the great opportunity to get to know other committed young people and human rights defenders." - Sophia

"Introduction to the UN" was one of the eye-opening events I have ever participated in. The agenda was perfectly scheduled, the participants fit well together, all other moments organized so well that we could get most of it despite the COVID restrictions. I wish IFOR would continue to maintain such an enthusiasm to support those who are willing to speak out about their issues, thus contributing to the peace movement." - Aku

"Introduction to the UN" is an intense and brilliant way to get to know and experience how the UN functions. To me was a chance to visit Geneva and its diplomatic atmosphere as well as lifestyle. In a multicultural environment, I had the chance to know more about local cases of human rights defenders such as the ones in South America witnessed by other participants and activists. I really enjoyed it and it was really inspiring!" - Silvia

"I enjoyed the program in general a lot as it helped me to get a deeper understanding of the UN in general and IFORs international work in particular. It was super interesting to slowly realize how complex international diplomacy can be and how strategic the work of NGOs like IFOR has to be to achieve any impact on a specific topic." - Marco

"This was an enlightening experience with a really engaged group, that was put together in the midst of covid restrictions, that nevertheless conveyed the reality of how the UN works and how it is possible for civil society to engage with it." - Peter

"The UN system is incredibly difficult and convoluted, an experience like this UN introductory week can demystify your preconceptions of the world of the United Nation and show you in very practical terms how you can use the different aspects of the UN system to further your own humanitarian and sociopolitical goals either personal or within an organization." - Iskra

Comment

IFOR submits to the UN UPR reports on the right to conscientious objection to military service in the Republic of Korea and Switzerland

Comment

IFOR submits to the UN UPR reports on the right to conscientious objection to military service in the Republic of Korea and Switzerland

IFOR has prepared and submitted to the UN two reports for the upcoming 42nd session of the Universal Periodic Review of the Republic of Korea and Switzerland. The formal session will take place at the beginning of 2023.

The Republic of Korea has a long-standing history of discrimination and violations of human rights of conscientious objectors. It has been noted as a country with an high level of inprisoned conscientious objectors.

In the recent years there has been a significative legislative development with the introduction by law of an alternative service which, unfortunately, in practice remain punitive and discriminatory. Korean conscientious objectors, indeed, serve a 36 months alternative service in prison or other correctional facilities and some are still sentenced to prison.

Other issues of concern are the lack of independence and impartiality of the body examining applications for conscientious objector status and the lack of effective remedies to victims of violations.

IFOR has include as well in its report suggested recommendation to be addressed to the Republic of Korea to respect and fully implement the human rights of conscientious objectors.

In the past cycle of the Universal Periodic Review, the Republic of Korea has received multiple recommendations by Member States and had rejected all but one about the releasing of all conscientious objectors imprisoned; this is a commitment which has not been yet completely fulfilled.

You can read here the complete country based report with more details on the legal development and insights on international standards.

You can find more information on the previous cycle of the Universal Periodic Review of the Republic of Korea here.


In Switzerland the domestic legislation does not fully comply with the international standards. IFOR has raised concerns related to the right to conscientious objection to military service such as the punitive duration of the alternative civilian service, the criminalisation of conscientious objectors who refuse or fail to perform the punitive and discriminatory alternative civilian service and finally the violation of the right to fair trial of conscientious objectors tried by military courts.

You can read the complete report here.

You can find out more about the previous review of Switzerland here.


The Universal Periodic Review is a State-driven process, which provides the opportunity for each State to present what actions they have taken to improve the human rights situation in their country and to fulfil their human rights obligations; the State under review will also report on the implementation of the previously accepted recommendations. UN Member States have the possibility to ask questions and make recommendations to the State under review. UPR Working Group consists of the 47 members of the Council, however any member state can take part in the discussion.
The review is based on information provided by the interested State, independent human rights experts and other stakeholders such as NGOs.
NGOs reports and proposed recommendations can be referred to by any of the States taking part in the interactive discussion during the review; it is therefore of vital importance to engage at the UPR and address specific issues which can be therefore part of the dialogue with the country under review.
IFOR focuses in particular on issues related to conscientious objection and to the militarization of society. 

IFOR is currently running a particular conscientious objection project, funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust (JRCT), a grant-making Quaker trust. Among the main aims there are research work and redaction of thematic country-based reports to be submitted to the UN for the regular State reviews on human rights.

The right to refuse to kill, although it is a human right, it is not recognized in all countries and many objectors are persecuted.

IFOR is committed to support this right and make a lasting change in society, for peace. JRCT recognizes that "change can take many years to achieve and is willing to take the long view, and to take the risks".

Comment

IFOR addresses the UN Human Rights Council on the right to conscientious objection and the war in Ukraine

Comment

IFOR addresses the UN Human Rights Council on the right to conscientious objection and the war in Ukraine

On July 5th, during the interactive dialogue on the situation in Ukraine at the 50th session of the UN Human Rights Council, IFOR took the floor in the plenary to report on conscientious objectors sentenced in Ukraine for refusing to bear arms and called on UN Member States to contribute to a peaceful setting of the ongoing armed conflict.


Human Rights Council, 50th session 

Geneva, 5th July 2022 

Item 10: Interactive dialogue on the oral update of the High Commissioner on Ukraine Oral statement delivered by the International Fellowship of Reconciliation. 

Mr. President,  

International Fellowship of Reconciliation (IFOR) thanks the High Commissioner and her office for the oral presentation  on Ukraine. 

We stand in solidarity with the people of Ukraine and mourn with them at this dramatic time of armed conflict. We stand in solidarity with all war resisters and conscientious objectors to military service in Ukraine as well as in Russia  and Belarus and call on the international community to provide them asylum; for instance IFOR sponsored a joint appeal  to European Institutions on this matter1. 

Freedom of thought, conscience and religion is a non-derogable right and, as is freedom of expression, it continues to apply  in situations of armed conflict. The right to conscientious objection to military service should be absolutely protected and  cannot be restricted as highlighted by the quadrennial analytical thematic report by OHCHR presented at this session2. 

IFOR is concerned about the violations of this right in Ukraine where general mobilization to the army is enforced without  any exceptions for conscientious objectors3. Evasion of conscription during mobilization is criminally punishable by  imprisonment from 3 to 5 years4. The pacifist Andrii Kucher and the evangelical Christian, [member of the church "Source  of Life"] Dmytro Kucherov were sentenced by Ukrainian courts for their refusal to bear arms with no respect to their  freedom of conscience5. 

IFOR is also concerned by the forced mobilization of conscripts in Ukrainian territory controlled by Russian affiliated  armed groups6. 

As previously stated7, war should be abolished because it is never a conflict resolution, neither in Ukraine nor in other  countries. UN Member States should urgently pursue a diplomatic way to peace negotiations and facilitate such a path which is within the United Nations purposes. 

Thank you.



Insights on the current warfare in Ukraine.

According to a recent report of UN HRMMU: "OHCHR is concerned that some conscripts forcibly mobilised in territory controlled by Russian affiliated armed groups are being prosecuted by Ukrainian authorities without due regard for applicable combatant immunity"

Learn more here.

If someone hides a Russian deserter in Ukraine (even Ukrainian-born one), that person could be charged by Ukrainian police in collaboration with the aggressor state.

Read more here.

Handing out calls for military mobilization at churches. If you failed to appear on call, you could be sentenced for evasion.

Read more here.


Insights on the individual cases reported in IFOR's statement

Sentence for Kucher Andrii Volodymyrovych

https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104351558

Case category No.303/2482/22: Criminal cases (from 01.01.2019); Criminal offenses in the

sphere of protection of state secrets, inviolability of state borders, provision of conscription

and mobilization; Evasion of conscription for military service during mobilization, for a

special period, for military service upon conscription of reservists in a special period.

Sent by the court:05/18/2022.

Registered:19.05.2022.

Published:05/20/2022.

Date of entry into force:06/20/2022

Number of court proceedings:1-kp/303/124/22

Number of criminal proceedings in the EDPR:12022071040000275

 

May 18, 2022, Mukachevo

 

Mukachevo City and District Court of Zakarpattia Oblast

 

- in the commission of a criminal offense (crime), provided for in Article 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine,

 

established:

 

The accused XX on March 13, 2022, being conscripted, arrived at the Mukachevo District Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, in connection with the announcement by the Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 69-2022 of February 24, 2022 of general mobilization and conscription for military service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. On the same day, 13/03/2022, XX, being in the premises of the Mukachevo District Territorial Center for Equipment and Social Support of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine at the address of the city of Mukachevo, str. Dukhnovycha, 89, having been duly notified by the employees of the above-mentioned center about the draft for military service during the general mobilization, as well as about the consequences of refusing to be drafted and undergo military service during the mobilization announced by the Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 69-2022 of 24.02. 2022, the latter reliably knowing that in accordance with the Decree of the President of Ukraine No.

64-2022 dated 24.02.2022 “On the introduction of martial law on the territory of Ukraine”, in connection with the military aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, with the aim of evading the draft for mobilization, without valid reasons, acting deliberately, in violation of the requirements of Article 65 of the Constitution of Ukraine, Article 1, 39 3 of the Law of Ukraine “On Military Duty and Military Service of Ukraine of March 25, 1992 No. 2232-ХІ, Article 22 of the Law of Ukraine “On mobilization training and mobilization”; dated October 21, 1993 No. 3543-ХІ, and Decree of the President of Ukraine “On general mobilization”; dated February 24, 2022 No. 69-2022, being applicable to military service, refused to receive a summons/call to send to the army and undergo military service - under such circumstances, evaded conscription for military service during mobilization in a special period.

Thus, XX committed a criminal offense (crime) provided for in Art. 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine- evasion of conscription for military service during mobilization in a special period.

Accused XX, his guilt in committing the criminal offense (crime) charged against him, provided for in Art. 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine fully admitted and showed that he really acted deliberately, aware of the illegal nature of his actions and their punishment, under the circumstances described in the indictment, evaded

conscription for military service during mobilization in a special period in connection with the fact that pacifist views and does not want to take up arms. He does not repent of what he has done, because it would contradict his views. At the same time, he asks not to punish him strictly and to postpone the execution of the sentence for one year, because he has something to do.

Recognizing that it is inexpedient to investigate other evidence regarding the factual circumstances of the case, which are not contested by anyone in the manner provided for in Art. 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, to which the participants of the trial did not object, while clarifying the circumstances regarding the correct understanding of the content of these circumstances by the accused and other participants of the trial, in the absence of doubts about the voluntariness and truthfulness of their positions, explaining to them that in such a case they will be deprived of the right to challenge these factual circumstances of the case in the appeal

procedure, the court limited itself only to the questioning of the accused and the study of such materials of the case that characterize the person of the accused.

Evaluating the evidence collected in the case as a whole, the court comes to the conclusion that the actions of the accused are correctly classified as Art. 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, i.e. evasion of conscription for military service during mobilization in a special period, and his guilt has been proven and fully recognized by him.

When choosing the type and degree of punishment for the accused, the court takes into account the nature and degree of social danger of the criminal offense (crime) committed by him, all the circumstances of the case in their totality, data about the identity of the culprit, guided by the law.

Yes, XX is conscripted, fit for military service due to his state of health, not previously convicted, according to the pre-trial report of the authorized probation body, XX has been registered as an internally displaced person since March 11, 2022 in connection with the introduction of martial law in of Ukraine, he is not registered with a narcologist, psychiatrist or phisiologist, the risk of him committing a repeated criminal offense is “medium”, the risk of danger to society is “medium”.

Circumstances mitigating the punishment of the accused have not been established by the court.

Circumstances aggravating the punishment of the accused have not been established by the court.

Taking into account the above, guided by the principles of humanity, necessity and sufficiency of the punishment to correct the accused and prevent new criminal offenses, the court comes to the conclusion that the correction of the accused is possible without isolation from society and serving the sentence, since such cases under the given circumstances would be excessively severe punishment, and the

accused XX should be punished within the sanction of Art. 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine with the application of the probationary period (Article Ukraine) and imposing on him the obligations provided for in clauses 1, 2, part 1 of Article 76 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

No civil action has been filed in the case.

There are no material evidence and procedural costs.

Guided by: Art.368-374,376 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, the court -

 

DECIDED:

XX, to be found guilty of committing a criminal offense (crime) provided for in Art. 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, imposing a penalty of imprisonment for 4 (four) years.

On the basis of Art. 75 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine to release the convicted XX from serving the sentence of probation imposed by this sentence, if he does not commit a new crime within 3 (three) years of the probationary period and fulfills the duties assigned to him, provided for in clauses 1, 2, part 1 of Article 76 of

the Criminal Code of Ukraine, 1) periodically appear for registration with the authorized body on probation; 2) notify the authorized probation authority about a change of place of residence and work.

Preventive measure against XX was not applied.

An appeal against the verdict may be filed with the Zakarpattia Court of Appeals through this court within thirty days from the day of its announcement.

The judgment of the court becomes legally binding after the expiry of the period for filing an appeal, if such an appeal has not been filed. In the event of an appeal, the court’s verdict, if it has not been annulled, becomes legally binding after the decision of the appellate court.

Participants in court proceedings have the right to receive a copy of the verdict in court. A copy of the verdict is delivered to the accused and the prosecutor immediately after its pronouncement.

 

Sentence for Kucherov Dmytro Mykolayovych

https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/104846891

Case category No.398/1551/22: Criminal cases (from 01.01.2019); Criminal offenses in the sphere of protection of state secrets, inviolability of state borders, provision of conscription and mobilization; Evasion of conscription for military service during mobilization, for a special period, for military service upon conscription of reservists in a special period.

Sent by the court:06/21/2022.Registered:06/21/2022.Published:06/22/2022.

Number of court proceedings:1-kp/398/187/22

Number of criminal proceedings in the EDPR:12022121060000535

Case No: 398/1551/22

proceedings No: 1-kp/398/187/22

 

VERDICT

behalf of Ukraine

 

21 June 2022. the city of Oleksandria, the Oleksandria City and District Court of the Kirovohrad region,

 

XX , being conscripted, on April 29, 2022 at about 900:00, arrived at the Oleksandriysky District Territorial Center of Manpower and Social Support of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine at the address: st. Shevchenko, 85, Oleksandria, Kirovohrad Oblast to undergo a medical examination and clarify their credentials.

The employees of the above-mentioned center XX was informed about the conscription for military service during the general mobilization, as well as the consequences of refusing to be called up and undergo military service during the general mobilization, announced by the Decree of the President of Ukraine “On General Mobilization” No. 69-2022 dated 24.02.2022 .

XX, reliably knowing about the general mobilization announced by the Presidential Decree No. 69-2022 of 24.02.2022 “On the introduction of martial law on the territory of Ukraine”, in connection with the military aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, with the aim of evading the draft for mobilization, acting

deliberately, being aware of his actions, not having the right to postponement, in violation of the requirements of Article 65 of the Constitution of Ukraine, Articles 1, 39 of the Law of Ukraine “On Military Duty and Military Service of Ukraine of March 25, 1992 No. 2232-XII”, Art.1, Art.22 of the Law of Ukraine “On Mobilization Training and Mobilization” dated October 21, 1993 No. 3543-XII, and Decree of the President of Ukraine “On General Mobilization” No. 69-2022 dated February 24, 2022, being recognized as fit for military service in the presence of the employees of the Oleksandriysk District Territorial and a summons to be sent to the army for military service under general mobilization to order command No. : evasion of the draft for mobilization for a special period.

At the court session, XX fully admitted his guilt in committing the specified criminal offense, explained, as indicated above, added that he is a Christian, a member of the Church of God of Ukrpaina “Source of Life”, therefore he refused to be drafted, because he does not want to fight with weapons in his hands.

The testimony of the accused corresponds to the factual circumstances of the case and the charges brought against him, the parties to the criminal proceedings do not dispute them, and therefore, in accordance with part 3 of Art.349 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the study of other evidence in the case was deemed inappropriate at the court hearing.

Thus, the court finds XX guilty of evading the call for mobilization for a special period, and qualifies his actions under Article 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

The court imposes a punishment within the limits established in the sanction of the article of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which provides for responsibility for the committed criminal offense, taking into account its degree of severity, the identity of the culprit and the circumstances mitigating and aggravating

the punishment. At the same time, a person who has committed a criminal offense must be given a punishment that is necessary and sufficient for his correction and prevention of new crimes.

Circumstances that in accordance with Art.67 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine aggravates the punishment of the accused XX has not been established.

Circumstances mitigating the punishment of the accused, in accordance with Part 1 Of Art. 66 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, there is sincere remorse and active assistance in solving the crime.

Studying the identity information of the accused XX, the court found that he is being held criminally liable for the first time, he is not registered with a narcologist or a psychiatrist; according to the place of actual residence is characterized positively; according to the information of the Oleksandriysk RV No. 1 of the branch of the

Probation Center of State Administration in the Kirovohrad region, it was established that XX, INFORMATION_1, is not registered in the Oleksandriysk RV No. 1 of the branch of the State Administration of Probation “Center of Probation” in the Kirovohrad region.

From the pre-trial report on the accused XX, drawn up by the Oleksandriyskiy RV No. 1 branch of the State institution “Probation Center” in the Kirovohrad region, it was established that the probation authority assessed the risk of the accused committing a repeated criminal offense as medium, the risk of danger to society, including for individuals persons also as an average. In the opinion of the probation body, correction of XX in the community is possible under the condition of imposing on him the obligations provided for in Clause 1, Clause 2, Part 1 of Art. 76 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

When sentencing the accused, the court is guided by the general principles of sentencing provided for in Art. 65 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and takes into account the degree of gravity of the criminal offense committed by him, data on the identity of the culprit and the circumstances affecting his punishment.

According to Art. Code of Ukraine, a criminal offense provided for in Art. 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is not a serious crime.

Taking into account the data on the identity of the accused, the circumstances that mitigate his punishment, taking into account the sincere remorse of XX and the desire to change his behaviour, preventing further violations of the law, the court came to the conclusion that the given circumstances testify to the possibility of

correction of the accused without isolation from society and serving the sentence, and hence the application to the accused of the provisions of Art. 75 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, however, with the supervision of him by the authorized probation authority at the place of residence during the probationary period, with the imposition of duties provided for in clauses 1, 2, part 1, part 2, part 3 of Art. .76 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Such a punishment is fair and sufficient to achieve the goals of punishment defined in Article 50 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

The accused was not given a preventive measure during the trial.

No civil action has been filed.

The fate of physical evidence should be decided in accordance with Art. 100 CCP of Ukraine.

There are no procedural costs in criminal proceedings.

On the basis of the above, guided by Art. Art.349,368-371,373-376 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, the court

 

RESOLVED:

to find XX guilty of the criminal offense provided for in Art. 336 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and sentence him to 3 (three) years of imprisonment.

On the basis of Art.75, clauses 1, 2, part 1, clause 2, part 3 of Art.76 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine to release XX from serving the prescribed sentence, if he does not commit a new criminal offense during the probationary period of 1 (one) year and fulfills the duties assigned to him: periodically appear for registration with the authorized body on probation issues, notify the authorized body on probation issues about changing the place of residence and work, not to leave the borders of Ukraine without the consent of the authorized body on probation issues.

Material evidence: a copy of the journal of the delivery of mobilization orders to conscripts assigned to the team of the Oleksandriy RTCC and SP, an act of refusal to receive a mobilization order, a mobilization order, a summons, an examination card and a medical examination, which are attached to the materials of the criminal

proceedings (resolution on the recognition of physical evidence from 05/25/2022) to be left in the court file.

The court’s verdict can be appealed on the grounds provided for in Article 394 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine to the Kropyvnytskyi Court of Appeal within 30 days from the day of its pronouncement.

In the case of an appeal, the verdict, if it has not been cancelled, becomes legally binding after the decision of the appellate court.

Comment

IFOR participation in The Nuclear ban week in Vienna

Comment

IFOR participation in The Nuclear ban week in Vienna

Here you can find a brief journal of IFOR attendance to the nuclear ban week in Vienna which has been very intense with outstanding events.

Don’t miss the photo album. [scroll down to the end]


Day 1 & Day 2

On the 18th and 19th we participated in the NGOs Forum organized by ICAN and on the 19th evening on the "Give peace a chance!" conference organized by ABFANG, IPB and WILPF.

At this link you can watch:

- recording of main events which took place during the June 18-19 NGOs Forum

- daily MSP TV: twice a day briefing concerning the ongoing Vienna events on nuclear disarmament (Conference on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons and Parliamentarians Conference on the 20th, 1MSP on 21-23rd, Youth Conference on the 21st . . .)

About 600 people participated in the Forum in the past 2 days, coming from all regions of the world such as the islands of the Pacific, Asia, Africa, South America . . .

The topic of nuclear weapons is a global urgent issue which involves those producing, owning and storing nukes and those who have been affected by their use and testing; nuclear weapons are a threat to human life and all earth life. The UN Treaty frames nukes as inhuman and illegal and it provides a plan to ban them!

At this link you can watch recording of main events which took place during the June 18-19 NGOs Forum

Pour lire en français, cliquez ici.

Para leer en español, haga clic aquí.


Day 3

On Monday July 20th, IFOR participated in the Conference on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons, which was organized by Austria at the Austrian center in Vienna with the participation of State delegations, NGOs, academics, OIs...

More info are available here.

Several experts took the floor on specific aspects concerning #nuclearweapons 1. What we know, 2. Impact on people and planet, 3. The risks.

Speakers were as well from UN Office for Disarmament Affairs Vienna, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) , International Committee of the Red Cross , KNOW NUKES TOKYO , UNIDIR, the UN Institute for Disarmament Research , Nuclear Information and Resource Service , SIPRI , Arms Control Association , Princeton University . . .

Here are some insights from the Conference:

  • P. Lewis reported on several cases concerning individuals who decided not to escalate as P. Stanislav in 1983.

  • "The more NATO emphasizes nuclear deterrence, the more it legitimizes nuclear threats" D. Kimball

  • "Nuclear detonation may be a low probability event, but not a zero probability event" J. Revill

  • "Nuclear colonialism has been affecting indigenous communities" M. Olsen

  • "Illusion to bend the future to our will; illusion of control" Z. Mian

  • "We live in a system of states, not of people, and states make wars" Z. Mian

  • "Fragility of security theory based on nuclear deterrence" Z. Mian

  • "Only the elimination of nuclear weapons offer effective prevention" Z. Mian

The detailed program is available here.

The complete list of speakers and bio is available here.

Chair's summary here.

The Opening remarks by Ms. Izumi Nakamitsu High Representative for Disarmament Affairs are available here.


Day 4

Tuesday 21st, the historical 1 Conference TPNW MSP started at the UN Vienna with the opening message by António Guterres UN Secretary General, the director of International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), UN Office for Disarmament Affairs Vienna.

We expected many States “observers” such as those in the middle of the ratification process and those still reluctant to sign the treaty.
4 NATO members (Norway, Belgium, Germany and The Netherlands) will attend as observers and there is the last minute chance for others to join in.
It's important not to give up and to persist on national campaigning and lobby efforts!

The meeting continued with testimonies from nuclear weapons victims.

Member States delivered statements on #nuclearweapons from different perspectives.

Here some insights from the general debate from States, IOs and NGOs:

  • "Preserve life, instead of threaten it"

  • "Unacceptable humanitarian consequences" Austria

  • "Deterrence is an ultimate call for further proliferation" Austria

  • "We need a realistic approach based on evidences" Austria

  • "Multilateral cooperation is the only way for global concerns" Austria

  • "Many ratifications from the Pacific which bears scars of decades of nuclear testing" New Zealand

  • "Nuclear weapons are never the answer" New Zealand

  • "Nuclear deterrence does not preserve peace" South Africa

  • "Sense of responsibility and urgency; no room for procrastination" South Africa

  • "Culture of peace instead of culture of death" Venezuela

  • "Nuclear weapons offer no security" Ireland

  • "Nuclear weapons are contrary to the spirit of U.N. and its Chart" Guyana

  • "Giant step for the preservation of human life" Trinidad and Tobago

  • "Importance of addressing the financing of such production" ICAN-Etica

  • "We banned them and we will eliminate them" Parliamentarians for the TPNW

  • "Every dollar on missile is a moral abhorrence" Fiji

TPNW is available here.

The Program of work of the 1MSP is available here.

ICAN updates on the 1st day of the MSP is available here.

Secretary-General’s video message to the Opening of the First Meeting of States Parties to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is available here.

ICAN executive director statement is available here.

To read in French, click here.

To read in Spanish, click here.


Day 5

On the 2nd day of the 1MSP, on June 22nd, the plenary adopted decisions on art. 4 of the #TPNW concerning above all 10 years time for the destruction of nuclear weapons owned by states parties and 90 days for the removal of nuclear weapons from hosting states.

 The working session then addressed Art. 6 and 7 on "Victim assistance and environmental remediation" and "International cooperation and assistance".

Among speakers there have been representatives of the civil society who shared their first hand testimonies as 2nd and 3rd generation affected victims.

International Fellowship of Reconciliation - IFOR joined an interfaith oral statement delivered by World Council of Churches on behalf of 144 NGOs, including Pax Christi InternationalSoka Gakkai . . .

You can read more on the Interfaith joined statement and its signatories here.

Kiribati rep called on all 1MSP participants to gather together as "brothers and sisters".

The debate was also characterized by statements of observer states such as NATO members Sweden, Germany, Norway and The Netherlands. 

Germany statement is available here.

Norway statement is available here.

Swede statement is available here.

Switzerland (another observer state at the 1MSP) statement is available here.

Read more insights on the 2nd day of the 1MSP here.


Day 6

The 3rd day of the 1MSP, on June 23rd, concluded an historical Conference on nuclear disarmament, which adopted by consensus the Vienna declaration: the Action Plan in 50 points to move forward with nuclear disarmament and fully implement.

More details are available here.

ICAN's preliminary analysis on these 2 historical documents is available here.

Several principles have been highlighted:

  • scientific advisory committee

  • universality

  • complementarity (with the NPT)

  • gender perspective


Several member states took the floor as well as NGOs such as International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) that stated again the perfect complementary with NPT and the TPNW's vital importance.

The plenary agreed as well on the 2MSP presidency to Mexico and the 3MSP presidency to Kazakhstan.

The President of the Conference, Alexander Kmentt, celebrated the historical outcome restating:

"Important message from this meeting, a clear message"

"Now the real work will start!"

"We set a new standard to work together and efficiently"

"Thank you to observers who have not yet made their mind on it"

"Viva Mexico!"

The meeting ended with excitement and celebrations from all participants, diplomats and civil society together.

Nuclear ban week concluded with renewed commitment to nuclear disarmament by all the MSP and renewed joint effort with civil society to free the world from nuclear weapons and remediate its harm.

Nuclear weapons are banned and there is a Plan!

The nuclear ban week has been a very intense week with many useful and interesting insights. 

July 7th commemorated as well the 5th anniversary of the adoption of the TPNW which entered into force on January 22nd 2021 following the reaching of its 50th ratification on October 24th 2020.

Till today, 66 countries had already ratified the TPNW


Day 1 Photo-Book


Day 2 Photo-Book


Day 3 Photo-Book


Day 4 Photo-Book


Day 5 Photo-Book


Day 6 Photo-Book


Additional Tools:

  • Take a look at the pictures and posts published on IFOR's Facebook page and share them!

  • At this link you can watch daily MSP TV: twice a day briefing concerning the ongoing Vienna events on nuclear disarmament (Conference on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons and Parliamentarians Conference on the 20th, 1MSP on 21-23rd, Youth Conference on the 21st . . .)

  • More streaming here

  • All the statements delivered during the 1MSP by invited guests, member states, observer states, international organizations and NGOs are available here.

  • ICAN's pictures from NGOs forum (free to use for ICAN’s partner organisations for non-commercial use, please just make sure to credit the photographer and ICAN):

  • ICAN's ED Beatrice Fihn highlights about the #nuclearbanweek:

    • The panels and discussions at the Nuclear Ban Forum were . I was so impressed with the energy, commitment, new and fresh angles on this issue and just the joy of us being together again.

    • It almost got lost in the noise, but we got three states (!) from three different continents to join the treaty on the eve of the MSP. This shows that the momentum for the treaty keeps growing, and we know many more states are on their way to ratify. Congratulations to Timor-Leste, Grenada and Cabo Verde

    • The first ever Parliamentarians for TPNW conference took place, and it was so great to see relationships building and  connections being made between our supportive parliamentarians across countries. Plans were made and participants plotted about how they can get their countries to join the treaty. This is such important work to increase the power and reach of the TPNW.

    • We had financial institutions engaging as stakeholders in the Treaty meetings for the first time. Financial institutions and investors  representing €230 billion sent a strong message of support and solidarity to the MSP, and raised divestment as a way to implement the TPNW.

    • We got five nuclear allied states, Norway, Germany, Australia, Netherlands and Belgium, to attend the MSP. While we have lots of work left to get them to join the treaty,  we need to recognize that this was a very impressive achievement for our partners in these countries. 

    • The Nuclear Ban Forum, the Humanitarian Conference and the MSP were packed with young people and new campaigners, from all corners of the world. This is such a clear sign that our movement is reasoning with people and becoming stronger and stronger. A big thanks to Youth for TPNW, Reverse The Trend and all other organisations that prioritized bringing young people to Vienna, and for every single partner organisation who are creating a campaign that is welcoming for new people and creating space for young activists to make their voices heard. 

    • The outcome documents of the MSP were really incredible achievements, and no other nuclear weapons forum will in the foreseeable future be able to get close to what we achieved.. The Vienna Declaration is the strongest multilateral declaration against the threat of nuclear weapons use that has ever been adopted. There are so many good parts in this document, and we hope to have more analysis and writings about it coming out soon. Please do share any writing and commentary that you and your networks are publishing on this, in absence of media coverage on this we need to make sure we spread the word ourselves.

    • The Vienna action plan is pretty unique for a UN treaty outcome document in its inclusiveness of civil society, impacted communities and academics and scientists as well as in its concrete and timebound commitments by states. Here’s a list of the key decisions that were taken, and we’ll follow up with more information and analysis of what this means in the coming weeks. 

Comment

IFOR 50th Human Rights Council Side Event: Language Rights in the People's Republic of China

Comment

IFOR 50th Human Rights Council Side Event: Language Rights in the People's Republic of China

Dear everyone,

We are pleased to invite you to a thematic virtual side event on Language Rights in the People's Republic of China, organized in collaboration with our local affiliate Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy

WEDNESDAY 29th AT 1:30 pm CEST on Zoom

Please, register here to get the link to connect on Wednesday.

Attached you can find the flier with more details on the speakers.

Looking forward to virtually meeting you,

Share on facebook!

---

Estimados todos,
nos complace invitaros a un evento paralelo virtual temático sobre los Derechos Lingüísticos en la República Popular China, organizado en colaboración con nuestra filial local Centro Tibetano para los Derechos Humanos y la Democracia

MIÉRCOLES 29 A LAS 13:30 CEST en Zoom

Por favor, regístrese 
aquí para obtener el enlace para conectarse el miércoles.

Adjunto puedes encontrar el flyer con más detalles sobre los ponentes.

Esperamos encontrarnos virtualmente con ustedes,

---

Chers tous,
Nous avons le plaisir de vous inviter à un événement parallèle virtuel sur les droits linguistiques en République Populaire de Chine, organisé en collaboration avec notre affilié local, le Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy.

MERCREDI 29 À 13h30 CEST sur Zoom

Veuillez vous inscrire 
ici pour obtenir le lien pour vous connecter mercredi.

Vous trouverez en annexe le dépliant avec plus de détails sur les intervenants.

Dans l'attente de vous rencontrer virtuellement,

Comment

IFOR joins interfaith statement at the 1MSP in Vienna

Comment

IFOR joins interfaith statement at the 1MSP in Vienna

On June 22nd, on the occasion of the 2nd day of the historical First Conference of the Member States Parties (1MSP) to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) which took place in Vienna, the World Council of Churches representative delivered an Interfaith statement signed by IFOR together with more than 140 other organizations.

Read here the complete text:


Joint Interfaith Statement Welcoming the First Meeting of the States Parties to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (22 June 2022) 

As faith communities from a diversity of traditions and located all over the world, we join together with one voice to mark this first Meeting of States Parties (MSP) to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). We welcome this historic occasion and celebrate this milestone that moves us closer to a world without nuclear weapons. 

We gather at a time when the threat of nuclear annihilation feels closer than before. So many more of us suffer from anxiety in response to the increasing threats by nuclear armed states. In the face of these urgent existential threats, we are more determined than ever to abolish nuclear weapons. 

We are acutely aware of the threats facing humanity and our beloved planet. From the devastating impacts of a global pandemic to the rising threat of climate catastrophe, the stakes for life on earth have never felt higher. Nuclear weapons represent a tangible manifestation of the worst of these threats with the risk they pose to human health and environmental stability. The resources currently spent on the development and maintenance of these weapons should be directed towards supporting the most vulnerable people and protecting the planet through investing in food, education, health care and climate justice. 

Our faith traditions call us to denounce this misuse of resources and to call for greater international cooperation to end nuclear weapons forever. Nuclear weapons are a tool of domination and violent coercion in a time when we urgently need to prioritize human security. Our religious and spiritual traditions uphold an ethos of mutual aid, care for the stranger and trust in the community. 

Our faith traditions continue to nurture the belief in a better future. We are reminded of our shared vulnerability and our shared capacity to make compassionate, intelligent policy choices. We remain committed not only to our own security but to the security and well-being of one another. We understand the interrelationship between justice and peace and we continue to commit ourselves to working for a world in which no community has the power to annihilate another, where the security of some does not depend on the insecurity of others. 

We urge the States Parties of the TPNW to heed the voices of the world’s hibakusha and contribute to strengthening the treaty through fully including the voices of affected communities so that as the international community we can begin the work of healing the harms caused by nuclear weapons. We also urge all States to work for the universalization of the TPNW, and invite all countries that have yet to ratify the treaty to do so in a timely manner. And finally, we urge all nuclear-weapon states to act in accordance with their commitment to nuclear disarmament and take concrete measures towards reducing nuclear threats.

In a world that often seems bleak, we celebrate this first MSP as a glimmer of light and hope. Just as we come together to unite our voices and prayers beyond our own faith traditions, we applaud your commitment to multilateralism and diplomacy in a time of divisiveness and tensions. We stand with you to rid the world of nuclear weapons, and create a world where we can advance together for common security and mutual flourishing. 


Comment